Eye Sight Improvement Testimonials
Romeo’s amazing story (Email to Hermina)
“…….In reference to my iMRS activities: I am using the mat each day AM & PM at your suggested Mid Range of 50-25 intensity for 8 minutes. It’s making me feel like I don’t want to miss any sessions. My latest Retina tests had the Vision Lab repeat their testing because they thought these results where too good. 20/200 improved to 20/25 !! What did you do to get these restored good values ?? the asked. Next testing session – if results remain unchanged – I will tell my secret !!!! Then I will provide them with the iMRS information that will blow them away.
Romeo J. Martin
Denver & Canada
MACULAR DEGENERATION
Dear Hermina
Thanking you, I cannot express the blessings that you have given our family this year. I have had my eye disease for so many years, and finally feel that the iMRS sessions may be a solution to this problem. The road has been difficult for me and my family. I do appreciate all the thought and effort you have extended in kindly restoring our health. I have tried so many different treatments, yet magnetic resonance stimulation seems to be the only one that is safe as well as effective. My family and I are grateful for your kindness and caring. We are so lucky to have found you.
Stephanie Chern, Denver, CO
BLINDNESS
The story of Dianne C. Nassr, Massachusetts
Hi Hermina,
My name is Dianne C. Nassr and I have a Healing Arts Center where I am using the “MRS 2000 designo” unit on my clients. I have had an amazing experience with a 17 year old young man who was legally blind after a surgery he experienced to his spine. He was totally blind for 10 months. I am trained in alternative energy techniques and initially that is where I started working with him. When my MRS 2000 arrived last May, I started spending time with this child on the mat, using also the probe. His vision increased every time I used these applications. After four treatments during a 4 month period, he began to see shapes and colors. His parents purchased an MRS 2000 MED for home use and now he is able to read. He is doing GREAT. Please share this story with Wolfgang. For Wolfgang to meet this young man would truly be wonderful.
From the Desk of Dr. med. H-D Walther, Germany
Due to the blood pressure regulatory effect as well as its immune system enhancement, magnetic resonance stimulation has proven very effective in ophthalmology. Incorporating MRS into our own treatment methods, the patient will benefit from an improved circulation, which in turn causes a quick regeneration of nerve cells. It is necessary to use the whole body application first, followed by a local application. Treating illnesses of the eyes, the pillow needs to be placed under the patient’s head. The regulatory effect of MRS can stabilize the intraocular pressure in glaucoma, saving medication and thus reducing side effects. Other eye diseases that are positively influenced by this treatment method are “open-angle” glaucoma, optic atrophy, vascular weakness, retinal degeneration, macular degeneration, hematoma, edema and Sjoegren’s Syndrome.
Dr. med.H.-D. Walther. Ophthalmologist
“Informationsdienst Magnetfeldtherapie“
Sharon’s Eye Testimonial
I started seeing Dr. Yee for bifocal contact lenses six years ago. Over the years, my vision has become very stable and my corneas are not changing shape as much as they used to. When you wear toric lenses (the hard lenses), in order to see, the lense has to change the shape of your eyes. Changing the shape of the eyes is what corrects the vision. My lenses are interchangeable now. This means that it doesn’t matter if I put the left contact on my right eye and visa versa.
The last time I went in for my eye exam, I experienced something new. Rather than dilating my eyes, I had a digital scan done. It was more money, but really worth the extra because I got to see my eye balls on a large computer screen and Dr. Yee explained everything about the images. He said that my eye balls were very healthy and there was no indication of macular degeneration or retinal detachments.
All-in-all, I am so happy about my eyes. I wear my contacts 20 hours a day and do not suffer from dry eyes or any kind of problems with wearing the toric lenses. I have also had prescription sunglasses made for cycling. Dr. Yee said to only do distance as my near sightedness is corrected by just taking my sunglasses off. When it comes to seeing things close, I don’t even have to wear my contacts and my vision is pretty good.
Over time, I know that the iMRS/MRS has balanced and continues to balance what my body needs on a daily basis. The measurable changes that my eyes have made are just one part of what the iMRS/MRS has done for my body and mind. I love PEFMs!
Sharon Akiyama, Denver and Florida
Webpage link “From the Desk of German MDs” Please click to read this important article
https://pemfassistance.com/germanmd/mrs-in-the-field-of-opthalmology
Eye Disease Study
Results of PEMF
The results of 30 patients with macular degeneration and glaucoma were presented
at the 81st international Conference of Light and Vision on May 4, 2013 in
St. Petes Beach, FL. Each patient received a total of 10 PEMF treatments over a 5 day period. One body treatment to strengthen the core energy and then one treatment on the eye.
27 patients-54 eyes (average age 73.2)
Average ETDRS Vision 37.8 letters
Average Change in vision 5.34
Range 0 to 65 letters
Average Contrast 1.2
Farnsworth + 6.2
Campimetric fields
3 eyes no color to color!
Average change 97%
Range 0 to 400%
Results with Macular Degeneration
17 patients (24 eyes)
Average Age 76.3
Average ETDRS Vision 38.8 letters
Range 0 to 60 letters
Average Contrast 1.28
Average Change in vision 5.15
Range -2 to +18
Farnsworth Hue +7
Campimetric fields
3 eyes no color to color!
Average change 120%
Range 0 to 400%
Patients with Glaucoma
9 patients (18 eyes)
Average Age 73.6
Average ETDRS Vision 37.9 letters
Range 0 to 62 letters
Average Contrast 1.36
Average Change in vision 6.25
Range -2 to +28
Tensions average 19 (13 to 36)
Average pressure change (-2.8)
Farnsworth hue change +5.3
Campimetric fields
Average change +44%
Range 0 to 400%
Conclusion
The majority of patients in this study had an improvement of vision, Average change was over 5 letters or one line of vision (Significant) They also had an improvement of contrast average change of 1.2 letters (not significant), average change in visual field of 97% (very significant) and 3 patients who went from seeing no color to seeing color! (amazing!) There was a slight lowering of pressure in the glaucoma patients of 2.8mm HG (not significant) 2 patients dropped out of the study. Care must be taken to administer a low level of gauss/Tesla energy and caution must be used in the treatment of wet macular degeneration These results are very favorable and indicate that PEMF can be helpful in restoring lost vision